MATRIXSYNTH: The World's Biggest Trance Lead?


Friday, May 18, 2007

The World's Biggest Trance Lead?


YouTube via suitandtieguy.

"In this video, I attempt to create the world's biggest trance lead using a Prophet-10 and the STG Soundlabs Radiophonic Accessory System under control of a x0xb0x. I'm not sure if i was successful, but it did sound pretty trancey. Other tools abused in this video include a CR-8000, Juno-6, Mackie mixer, Lexicon MPX-110, and Oktava MK-219 microphone. Modules available at stgsoundlabs.com"

17 comments:

  1. Pretty cool. The trancy lead was great. An mp3 sample would be good so we could enjoy it in all its sonic glory. Actually I liked the CM-8000 as well, it isn't heard that often like this. Very muted sounds which worked for me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. it's quite boring without the VO but i can flip that off as an MP3 tomorrow. i would actually like to record a track with this setup because while i set it up to be just an obscene demonstration of the heaviest and most expensive trance lead ever (five grand? six grand? for one voice!) when i got to using it i was amazed at how _good_ it sounded. especially when the filter was further down ... just struck me as a very pretty sound.

    also Matrix, thanks for the post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That is some awesome family guy type humor going on
    cheers :P

    ReplyDelete
  4. you should have spread those 20 oscs between like 5 octaves.. that would have been much bigger

    ReplyDelete
  5. The gauntlet's been thrown, Yeti. Do it up. ;-)

    Also, glad to see the CR8000 getting some exposure. It's one of my favorite analog drum machines, strictly for the sounds.

    ReplyDelete
  6. dont have that kind of gear laying around, (but i wish i did)

    i can do it thru overdubbing if you want

    i'll send matrix a mp3 later tonight

    ReplyDelete
  7. Meh, it's not really big until your 21st sawtooth.


    ;-)

    S0unds great.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As I commented on Youtube, you probably just have to take something like a MKS-70 which is 12 voices polyphonic with 2 osc for each voice. You can then get a massive 24 saws stacked.. + chorus if needed.
    Then you may top that, especially if combined with the what Awakaned Yeti suggested.
    Regards

    ReplyDelete
  9. The whole time I watched that I was counting in my head how many sawtooth wave sources I have in my studio that I could potentially gang together.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Not impressed. Analog synths just don't have the precision for this sort of task.

    I would rather see the same thing generated with a softsynth.

    ReplyDelete
  11. hmmmm.... my olde kawai sx 240 has 2 osc's plus sub osc plus "brass" (ring mod from osc 1+2) as a seperate source, so.. virtually 4 osc's, 8 x polyphony put that on unison add chorus and pwm... would that beat it osc wise? easily. Soundwise, dunno. The cam mic always makes it sound crappier than it is. Not that your patch is crappy. It's great. Your cam takes the bite off it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I just tried my Andromeda A6 with 16 voices in unison, each with two oscillators and 2 sub oscillators per voice for 64 analog oscillators. I used a little unison detune as well. Sounds pretty good. Now I bet if I record it with my camera mic it'll sound like the Casio Vl-1 lead in Da-Da-Da.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Matrix. Maybe you should host an analog "fat sounds" challenge with readers voting on who's the fattest of all (sounds that is). No digital effects processing allowed, and limited to 4 bar riff of the sound. Anyway, something like that might be cool.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm sure with csound you could do a non-real-time render of a gagillion oscillators, each varying by some random seed modifying the parameters along a Hamiltonian path.

    ReplyDelete
  15. >>The whole time I watched that I was counting in my head how many sawtooth wave sources I have in my studio that I could potentially gang together.

    Me too. I counted 50 something, but really it was 12. If we stick to analog, then I am down to 4. This means I need more gear. lol

    ReplyDelete
  16. remember ... "biggest" didn't necessarily mean "most number of sawteeth" ... i was going by sheer weight of the primary oscillator bank.

    and a Prophet-10 weighs about 200 lbs, so this is currently a tall order.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The thickness of the sound is pretty limited due to that fact that a) these are CEM chips and b) the voices are stacked but not able to be that far detuned like 10 separate modular OSCs could be.

    This isn't a trance lead, but my demo of two Oberheim SEMS (4 Oscs) could be one of the fattest analog sound possible without losing cohesion.

    http://www.rewiremusic.com/Audio/Demos/REwire_-_Oberheim_2_SEM_Demo.mp3

    ReplyDelete

To reduce spam, comments for posts older than one week are not displayed until approved, usually same day. Do not insult people. For items for sale, do not ask if it is still available. Check the auction link and search for the item. Auctions are from various sellers and expire over time. Posts remain for the pics and historical purposes. This site is meant to be a daily snapshot of some of what was out there in the world of synths.

PREVIOUS PAGE NEXT PAGE HOME


Patch n Tweak
Switched On Make Synthesizer Evolution Vintage Synthesizers Creating Sound Fundlementals of Synthesizer Programming Kraftwerk

© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH